From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Optimization for lazy_scan_heap |
Date: | 2016-10-17 07:39:51 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoDrRwZm-nqi1scwLDXioFJTJa7RqXNE7H1Ae5uiYCCH_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Some initial comments on optimize_lazy_scan_heap_v2.patch.
>
> Seems worth pursuing. Marking as returned with feedback because of
> lack of activity and some basic reviews sent.
Thank you for reviewing this patch, and sorry for my late reply.
I've measured the performance improvement of this patch, but I got the
result showing that it can improve vacuum freeze performance 30 sec
with 32TB table. I don't think that this patch is worth to pursue any
further, so I'd like to withdraw this.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-10-17 07:50:06 | Re: postgres_fdw super user checks |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-10-17 07:32:54 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |