| From: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Auditing extension for PostgreSQL (Take 2) |
| Date: | 2015-04-30 03:57:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAD21AoCQSGZ5x+sfs4g1x_8Fip60x8ULQFTAGB5XTrKQZvPWPA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:17 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 4/28/15 2:14 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:23 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I've also added some checking to make sure that if anything looks funny
>>> on the stack an error will be generated.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback!
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for updating the patch!
>> I ran the postgres regression test on database which is enabled
>> pg_audit, it works fine.
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> If someone don't have review comment or bug report, I will mark this
>> as "Ready for Committer".
>
> Thank you! I appreciate all your work reviewing this patch and of
> course everyone else who commented on, reviewed or tested the patch
> along the way.
>
I have changed the status this to "Ready for Committer".
Regards,
-------
Sawada Masahiko
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-04-30 04:31:31 | Re: Reducing tuple overhead |
| Previous Message | Sawada Masahiko | 2015-04-30 03:54:49 | Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL |