Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg S <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Date: 2016-03-11 17:48:05
Message-ID: CAD21AoBzn-LsnwofgBNu-rDi_SgWrt34pq0BYHDG1Hb-bvXWyw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Thanks. I adopted some of your suggested, rejected others, fixed a
>>> few minor things that I missed previously, and committed this. If you
>>> think any of the changes that I rejected still have merit, please
>>> resubmit those changes as separate patches.
>>
>> Thank you for your effort to this feature and committing it.
>> I guess that I couldn't do good work to this feature at final stage,
>> but I really appreciate all your advice and suggestion.
>
> Don't feel bad, you put a lot of work on this, and if you were getting
> a little tired towards the end, that's very understandable. This
> extremely important feature was largely driven by you, and that's a
> big accomplishment.
>
>> I got your point.
>> Attached latest patch can skip to write the last part of last old page
>> if it's empty.
>> Please review it.
>
> Committed.
>
> Which I think just about brings us to the end of this epic journey,
> except for any cleanup of what's already been committed that needs to
> be done. Thanks so much for your hard work!
>

Thank you so much!
What I wanted deal with in thread is almost done. I'm going to more
test the feature for 9.6 releasing.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-03-11 17:52:42 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Previous Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-03-11 17:47:42 Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean