Re: version controlling postgresql code

From: akp geek <akpgeek(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Williamson <gwilliamson39(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: version controlling postgresql code
Date: 2012-02-29 16:32:27
Message-ID: CACnhOfKC8FM_Z-EHebcHomHTo6mQCGRrOS_31pqBxeTyYyuPWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks all. We will stick with CVS then. Thanks again

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Greg Williamson <gwilliamson39(at)yahoo(dot)com>wrote:

> akp geek asked:
>
> >
> > Would like to know if any one of you have used CVS or some other
> version controlling tools to version the postgres code? Any
> recommendations? Appreciate your help
> >
> >
>
>
> I used CVS at previous jobs.
>
> Currently the place I work uses git and a set of rules for programmers who
> create DDL changes, including rollback options (such as renaming columns to
> dropme_xxx instead of simply dropping them outright in the first change
> set).
>
> The SQL files are checked in with a timestamp which controls the order of
> updates when we apply them to runtime.
>
> I've had unpleasant experiences with commercial tools; CVS works well for
> simple environments and git can be used for more tangled development work.
>
> HTH,
>
> Greg Williamson
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-02-29 16:39:16 Re: Client encoding not the same as the db encoding
Previous Message Gary Chambers 2012-02-29 16:31:37 Re: what Linux to run