Re: pg_upgrade

From: Tomasz Szypowski <tomasz(dot)szypowski(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade
Date: 2019-03-19 08:09:05
Message-ID: CACmJi2JsWWLjQ+NfYPUaS7w3d15Ehrd2-PFmLgVA6LyrQn03Eg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Yes, generalny i use 11.4 bins, but libpq, dump, dumpall, restore and psql
are old ones.
Nów I have made the test with original 9.5.16 to 10.2 and it succeeded. If
it is the binary version problem, I´m a little bit surprised, because I
havent´s seen it in a code.
If it is the only bug, that you have, so please do not change code, due to
my problem :-). I ´ll do my test one more time, this time with 11.2
binaries. Will let you then know.

regards
Thomas

W dniu pon., 18.03.2019 o 23:54 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napisał(a):

> Tomasz Szypowski <tomasz(dot)szypowski(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > As far as I remember pg_upgrade is from 11.2 rest is from 9.5.
>
> If you're not certain, run each program with the --version switch
> to find out. But pg_upgrade should be refusing to use pg_dump
> et al that aren't from its own major version.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2019-03-19 09:59:34 BUG #15702: Bug in pgadmin 4.3 for tables with json columns
Previous Message Matthias Otterbach 2019-03-19 07:08:52 Re: BUG #15700: PG 10 vs. 11: Large increase in memory usage when selecting BYTEA data (maybe memory leak)