Re: 9.4 docs current as of

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> 9.4 beta docs are listed as "Current as of 2014-05-10".
>> I'm assuming that's just a step we missed in the version stamping?
>
> No, what that means is that nobody has looked at the commit logs since
> then to see if the 9.4 release notes need any updates. Since we don't
> release-note simple bug fixes in a branch before the .0 release,
> 9.4 isn't yet getting the same notes as the back branches; it requires
> a scan of the commit logs with different criteria, ie look for feature
> changes. And I didn't do that over the weekend (I barely got the
> back-branch notes done :-().

Ah. I just did a "git log" on it and saw there were a number of
updates in the relnotes themselves, didn't reflect on the fact that
nobody had checked them against *other* updates to the tree.

> It will get done at least once before 9.4.0, but I suspect that any
> changes as a result of that will be pretty minor, so I'm not terribly
> upset that it didn't happen for beta2.

Nope, I agree. I just thought it meant something else...

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/