On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 18:57, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:37, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>> And FWIW, I'd find it a lot more useful for the CF app to have the
>>>> ability to post *reviews* in it, that would end up being properly
>>> Next you'll be saying we should have some sort of web application to help
>>> with the whole review process, show the work on an integrated sort of Review
>>> Board or something. What crazy talk.
>> Well, it's early in the morning for being sunday, I blame that.
>>> My contribution toward patch review ease for this week is that peg is quite
>>> a bit smarter about referring to the correct part of the origin git repo
>>> now, when you've been working on a branch for a while then create a new one:
>> Being able to refer to a git branch is one of those things that have
>> been on the todo list for the cf app since pgcon last year...
> Do we have an actual written TODO list for the cf app somewhere? If
> not, I think creating one would be a good idea. I realize I've been
> remiss in addressing some of the things people want, but the lack of
> any centralized place where such items are collected doesn't make it
I don't think so - I've been keeping mine in your mailbox ;)
A simple wiki page is probably enough - going for an actual tracker or
anything seems vastly overkill...
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2012-01-16 18:41:09|
|Subject: Re: pgstat documentation tables|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-01-16 17:57:25|
|Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)|