From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: source download link in installation instructions |
Date: | 2013-02-05 06:44:16 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEz7iwsz7B-S=h-BMX72CeC5Db-H444Mu4nwo0PB=EYnmQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Feb 5, 2013 3:58 AM, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> The installation instructions in the devel branch
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/install-getsource.html
>
> contain a direct link to the tarball download
>
> ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/source/v9.3devel/postgresql-9.3devel.tar.gz
>
> which doesn't exist. It will presumably exist once there is a final
> release, but I think it's bad to have that link broken in the meantime,
> especially when beta comes around. It's also not clear whether ftp and
> tar.gz are necessarily the preferred download means anymore.
>
> Should we just provide a link to http://www.postgresql.org/download/ or
> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/ instead? Or perhaps just "ifdef"
> out the broken link in the devel versions?
Linking to /download/ seems like the best thing. Both because it gives you
a list of all the options, and because we don't lock into a specific
structure on the site. Not that we've change it recently, but links in the
docs are very permanent..
/Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tianyin Xu | 2013-02-08 09:38:09 | The relation between "checkpoint_timeout" and "checkpoint_warning" is missing |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-05 02:58:33 | source download link in installation instructions |