From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_statements temporary file |
Date: | 2012-05-24 12:19:50 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEyFnP6mFA=sJTY6VAT+WkKPw135OuBETLDKfcxSkz3r7g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 24 May 2012 12:42, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> What actually happens if it tries to repalloc() something huge? palloc
>> will throw an elog(ERROR), and since this happens during postmaster
>> startup, are you sure it won't prevent the server from starting?
>
> Oh, yes, missed that.
>
> /* Previous incarnation might have had a larger query_size */
> if (temp.query_len >= buffer_size)
> {
> buffer = (char *) repalloc(buffer, temp.query_len + 1);
> buffer_size = temp.query_len + 1;
> }
>
> Here, "temp" receives its value from an fread().
>
> This could probably be coded to be defensive against such things, but
> a better fix would be preferred. I have to wonder how much of a
> problem corruption is likely to be though, given that we only save to
> disk in a corresponding pgss_shmem_shutdown() call, which actually has
> more protections against corruption. The window for the saved file to
> be corrupt seems rather small, though I accept that a better window
> would be zero.
Right. But writing to a temp file and rename()ing it into place is trivial.
It's really the other issues raised that are bigger ;)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-05-24 12:22:11 | Re: shared_preload_libraries path |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-05-24 12:16:03 | Re: pg_stat_statements temporary file |