Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Mr(dot) Aaron W(dot) Swenson" <titanofold(at)gentoo(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Date: 2011-10-03 18:52:58
Message-ID: CABUevEy9Byud1Z-gg9ZERkc2FYsi917eP+rgP4jNXV_x92+6Xw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 20:39, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2011 02:25 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/03/2011 02:15 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/03/2011 12:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was never exactly thrilled with the separate-config-directory design
>>>>>> to start with, so I'm probably not the person to opine on whether we
>>>>>> could get away with removing it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The horse has well and truly bolted. We'd have a major row if anyone
>>>>> tried to remove it. Let's not rehash old battles. Our only option is to
>>>>> make it work as best we can.
>>>>
>>>> I disagree.  If people were using it we would have had many more bug
>>>> reports about pg_ctl not working.
>>>>
>>> No, that's an indication people aren't using pg_ctl, not that they
>>> aren't using separate config dirs.
>>
>> So, you are saying that people who want config-only directories are just
>> not people who normally use pg_ctl, because if they were, they would
>> have reported the bug?  That seems unlikely.  I will admit the Gentoo
>> case is exactly that.
>
> As Dave has pointed out there are many more people that use it, probably
> most notably Debian/Ubuntu users.
>
>> So we just document that config-only directories don't work for pg_ctl
>> and pg_upgrade?
>>
>
> I'd rather not if it can be avoided.

I think we "can live" with pg_ctl not working - since that problem has
already been solved by these people - at least partially.

Getting pg_upgrade to work would be a *lot* more important.

I'm not sure how big the overlap is - would it be easier if you moved
the required functionality into pg_upgrade itself, as you mentioned at
some point? As in, would it be easier to fix the config-only directory
case for the limited subset of functionality that pg_upgrade needs?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-10-03 18:53:11 Re: PostgreSQL X/Open Socket / BSD Socket Issue on HP-UX
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-03 18:41:00 Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories