Re: Non-replicated index allowing comparison ("<")?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Björn Edström <bjorn(at)spotify(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Non-replicated index allowing comparison ("<")?
Date: 2012-11-29 12:30:45
Message-ID: CABUevExVg+2=ujSveWjc-PGK5u=0G4PZPkL4dsNMisEugLBb+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Nov 29, 2012 8:59 PM, "Björn Edström" <bjorn(at)spotify(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Greetings list.
>
> I have a Postgresql 9.0.8 cluster with one master and a few slaves, in
> a hot standby and streaming replication setup. The setup has a single
> database with a single table. The table has a column "updated" of type
> "timestamp".
>
> For maintenance reasons I'd like to create a B-tree (or at least some
> kind of index allowing fast comparisons, "<" and ">" at least).
> However, I'd, if possible, like to create this index on a single
> machine in the cluster and not have it replicated everywhere. When the
> maintenance is done the index should be removed. Hash indices will not
> work in this case - it's non-replicated but does not work for
> comparisons.
>
> Ideas?

This is not possible with streaming replication. You'd have to look at one
of the external replication solutions out there, like Slony. In sr, you
need to create it on the master and have it replicate everywhere.

/Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ray Stell 2012-11-29 13:48:48 youtube video on pgsql integrity
Previous Message Björn Edström 2012-11-29 11:59:43 Non-replicated index allowing comparison ("<")?