Re: Planet posting policy

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: 2011-07-15 09:01:57
Message-ID: CABUevEx55-QCmk6rzDzuDoVOtbhh51vydWrssisWARqGdT+1uQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 20:14, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thursday, July 14, 2011, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 07/14/2011 12:48 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> Another example would be this blog post, which planet wouldn't aggregate:
>>
>> http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/alex_shulgin/2011/03/when_too_smart_becomes_stupid_fixing_a_ror_pgsql_driver_issue/
>>
>> The argument we got was that it was rails related, not postgresql releated. Seriously?
>
> From who? I can't see why we wouldn't accept that.

Yeah, I'd like to know that too. I searched what I could find in my
archives of the planet@ list, and saw nothing.

Because I think we *should* allow that type of post, it certainly is
postgresql related enough. IMHO, of course.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2011-07-16 05:37:49 Re: Planet posting policy
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-07-15 09:00:26 Re: Planet posting policy