Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:43, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2012 11:57 AM, Scott Mead wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Pretty delayed, but please find the attached patch that addresses all
>>>> the issues discussed.
>>>
>>>
>>> The docs on this v4 look like they suffered a patch order problem here.
>>>  In the v3, you added a whole table describing the pg_stat_activity
>>> documentation in more detail than before.  v4 actually tries to remove those
>>> new docs, a change which won't even apply as they don't exist upstream.
>>>
>>> My guess is you committed v3 to somewhere, applied the code changes for
>>> v4, but not the documentation ones.  It's easy to do that and end up with a
>>> patch that removes a bunch of docs the previous patch added.  I have to be
>>> careful to always do something like "git diff origin/master" to avoid this
>>> class of problem, until I got into that habit I did this sort of thing
>>> regularly.
>>>
>> gak
>
>
> I did a 'backwards' diff last time.  This time around, I diff-ed off of a
> fresh pull of 'master' (and I did the diff in the right direction.
>
> Also includes whitespace cleanup and the pg_stat_replication (procpid ==>
> pid) regression fix.
>

I'm reviewing this again, and have changed a few things around. I came
up with a question, too :-)

Right now, if you turn off track activities, we put "<command string
not enabled>" in the query text. Shouldn't this also be a state, such
as "disabled"? It seems more consistent to me...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/