Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Date: 2012-09-03 16:06:29
Message-ID: CABUevEwCnGnGQHGcXgNJe96tcG4NvF7VtLAhLutD2GAgrw+SFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
>
> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
> here.

(yes, i've been backlogged)

We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
both on the same bullet point?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-03 16:11:45 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-03 15:24:51 pgsql: Make psql's \d+ show reloptions for all relkinds.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-09-03 16:11:45 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-03 15:45:54 Re: Is this non-volatile pointer access OK?