From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |
Date: | 2012-09-03 16:06:29 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEwCnGnGQHGcXgNJe96tcG4NvF7VtLAhLutD2GAgrw+SFA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
>
> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
> here.
(yes, i've been backlogged)
We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
both on the same bullet point?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-03 16:11:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-03 15:24:51 | pgsql: Make psql's \d+ show reloptions for all relkinds. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-03 16:11:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-03 15:45:54 | Re: Is this non-volatile pointer access OK? |