Re: Release versioning inconsistency

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release versioning inconsistency
Date: 2012-06-20 09:23:23
Message-ID: CABRT9RCEPqviW9dzpB7tQKBDPjT8tdbToWMmmV+378wU3NKXgA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> (I do believe that using the v9.2.0beta marker is
> *better*, because then it sorts properly. But likely not enough much
> better to be inconsistent with previous versions)

Good point. Maybe that's a reason to change the versioning scheme and
stick with "9.2.0betaX" everywhere. Including calling the final
release "9.2.0" instead of simply "9.2"?

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-06-20 09:47:05 Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-06-20 09:18:23 Re: Release versioning inconsistency