Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?

From: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?
Date: 2013-05-01 02:14:25
Message-ID: CAB8KJ=hprggMDJ1LOzNxuQ8T4x=yZBHSBb96RuaCFhCRLBoWHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2013/5/1 Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 2013.04.30 4:55 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>> I would intuit that it's fine, but I just want to make sure there are
>>> no gotchas from a recovery point of view:
>>>
>>> If I were to lose my temp tablespace upon system crash, would this
>>> prevent proper crash recovery?
>>>
>>> Also, if I were to omit the temp tablespace from the base backup,
>>> would that prevent proper backup recovery?
>>
>>
>> Although it would be nice if what you said would work, I read in a recent
>> blog post that losing any tablespace would prevent the database server from
>> starting, even if it was only for temporary things. -- Darren Duncan
>
> That is unfortunate. Good thing I asked, I guess. Do you have a
> pointer to said blog post?

I think this is the post in question:

http://thebuild.com/blog/2013/03/10/you-cannot-recover-from-the-loss-of-a-tablespace/

(BTW please try not to top-post :) )

Regards

Ian Barwick

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mattk 2013-05-01 02:22:32 Unformatted view DDL in pg_dump
Previous Message Yang Zhang 2013-05-01 00:51:18 Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?