Re: raw output from copy

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: raw output from copy
Date: 2016-10-03 04:31:41
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTn1HWrHsHhwpqM7Cd6Ga2umPMxLixVoYWqQ1N9qB-H3A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am sending fresh version of COPY RAW patch.

Moved to next CF per this status.

+++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/test/copy-raw-regress.pl
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+#!/usr/bin/perl -w
+
+use strict;
I don't understand why this is shaped this way, I mean the perl part
if we have the TAP infra in place. MSVC is not testing it as well.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 04:33:02 Re: sequence data type
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-10-03 04:26:53 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take