| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Inoue, Hiroshi" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback behavior on error |
| Date: | 2014-03-28 05:37:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTbt0BDAWpjh7Gg+JOgYR4_D28KHXtfuaXVCS0Pty4+Ow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Inoue, Hiroshi <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> (2014/03/27 20:55), Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> (Moving back this thread to pgsql-odbc, so keeping a maximum of message
>> history)
>
>
> As for the patch in the original post,
>
> Is there any difference between rollback_on_error and
> rollback_error_value except the naming?
No differences. I just changed the name of this variable to be a
maximum consistent with the parameter introduced.
> The length of connection strings seem to be increased at least 3 bytes.
> Is it right?
Do you mean that with the introduction of the new parameter AA? If
yes, well I guess it is increased by 5 bytes ";AA=[0|1|2]".
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2014-03-28 05:44:33 | Re: History of WAL_LEVEL (archive vs hot_standby) |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2014-03-28 05:06:59 | Re: Archive recovery won't be completed on some situation. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2014-03-28 22:16:35 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback behavior on error |
| Previous Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2014-03-28 04:05:14 | Re: Building odbc driver on windows |