| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches) |
| Date: | 2016-12-12 23:44:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTSz2iyUhcBk_vc7nEwRrHKJEgmn0uqfQVS+ktOTDMCPQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> And now I'm noticing that Michael Paquier previously started a thread
> on this problem which I failed to note before starting this one:
>
> http://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqSYN05rGsYCTahxTz+2hBikh7=m+hr2JTXaZv_Ei=qJAg@mail.gmail.com
Yes. I already had a look at what could be done to expose the
auxiliary processes in a system view with a set of proposals, though I
am not sure what would be better. It would be better to move the
discussion on this thread in my opinion, we are tracking down a
solution for a new problem.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-12-13 00:05:08 | Re: pgsql: Add support for temporary replication slots |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-12 23:39:13 | Re: pgsql: Add support for temporary replication slots |