Re: pg_ctl promote wait

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl promote wait
Date: 2016-04-07 05:22:44
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTKHM7HJja=CrqNmAWa3UNxjD_X_gNrDBJDb4kXT2Prug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:47 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 3/16/16 12:19 PM, David Steele wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 3/9/16 3:08 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>>> Here are some comments about 0002
>> <...>
>>> I think that we had better do something like the attached first.
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> It's been a week since Michael reviewed this patch. Could you please
>> comment on his proposed changes as soon as possible?
>
> Bump.

Feature freeze is getting close by. Once the deadline is reached, I
guess that we had better return the patch.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-04-07 05:48:21 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-04-07 04:46:16 Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers