From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, Jayadevan M <maymala(dot)jayadevan(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: High Level Committers Wanted |
Date: | 2014-03-20 00:14:29 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT7D9v+t5dj5hfiUA2wxSBQ7F2rODd9Zyewgv0bA-EF+A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Andy Colson escribió:
>
>> I dunno. I'm new at conspiracy theories :-). I hoped, by some
>> stretch, Oracle was feeling the heat of competition from PG ... and
>> decided to "solve" the problem. See?
>
> If Oracle decided to solve the problem in these ways, I'm pretty sure
> they would already have many hackers' home coordinates and could have
> sent Iron Man after them long ago. I wouldn't worry about this, really.
You should be careful not to give ideas away. There may be enough
funds to really create a high-tech-funky suit like that :)
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Venkata Balaji Nagothi | 2014-03-20 03:31:05 | Re: Hot standby read slaves exceed max delay on WAL segment. Replication lag. |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-03-20 00:07:28 | Re: Alter column with views depended on it without drop views |