Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date: 2016-04-06 06:11:15
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT6C3=nFc5j51fmod7_XDOuSxtsMfR59vOO6pofDwSSMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:11 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>> I would prefer not to bump it to the next CF unless we decide this will
>> not get fixed for 9.6.
>
> It may make sense to add that to the list of open items for 9.6
> instead. That's not a feature.

So I have moved this patch to the next CF for now, and will work on
fixing it rather soonishly as an effort to stabilize 9.6 as well as
back-branches.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2016-04-06 06:29:12 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-06 06:09:13 Re: OOM in libpq and infinite loop with getCopyStart()