From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
Date: | 2014-05-06 23:03:50 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSuGNztUvhPbKuo4V1k=o5Fsq6GjBr39TN3Kd0m8r1cPQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Makes sense, especially knowing operators needed for btree processing
> are already defined. Patch attached solves that.
Please find attached an updated patch, I completely forgot that the
compare function needs to return {-1, 0, 1}.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
20140507_pglsn_btree_hash_v2.patch | text/plain | 6.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-05-06 23:07:22 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-05-06 23:01:16 | Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) |