| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can extension build own SGML document? |
| Date: | 2015-09-15 20:29:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSs0RD9bVoRyvghLSb38nS2kJpzkuwwu--Vm+DEVvS8+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I mean, I can't see that building a PDF of the documentation really
> has much value, and I don't know even what else we can build. Who in
> 2015 would use a PDF instead of HTML?
>
> (If there is somebody, that is fine. But I am curious who it is and
> why, because it seems to me like it would just be a nuisance.)
Paper publication, say that for example:
http://www.network-theory.co.uk/postgresql9/vol1a/
I imagine that this applies as well to other languages as it is easier
to maintain a translation of the documentation by hacking the sgml
code.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-15 21:21:44 | Re: Can extension build own SGML document? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-15 20:29:41 | Re: pgsql: RLS refactoring |