Re: Backporting PostgresNode.pm

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Backporting PostgresNode.pm
Date: 2016-10-03 08:05:20
Message-ID: CAB7nPqShm4u_F5wX6QmMcaK7=HMSm3O-mDp6-xf7Enjk5pOj=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom mentioned in "9.6 TAP tests and extensions" [1] that
>
> "[I]n the past we've often regretted it when we failed
> to back-patch TAP infrastructure fixes all the way back to 9.4."
>
> [...]
>
> If folks think this is a good idea I can do the compat wrapper for the
> existing tests and submit patches. I've got src/test/recovery running
> happily for 9.5 already.

+1 from here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2016-10-03 08:57:44 pgbench - allow backslash continuations in \set expressions
Previous Message Vitaly Burovoy 2016-10-03 07:53:09 Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch