Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON, psql and access methods
Date: 2016-06-01 00:24:11
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSeYgjjiSu5Ae_yvEPXTRkYBYwgXrB0GRYtLjH3_N=nDg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> As far as I can see, COMMENT ON has no support for access methods.
>> Wouldn't we want to add it as it is created by a command? On top of
>> that, perhaps we could have a backslash command in psql to list the
>> supported access methods, like \dam[S]? The system methods would be in
>> this case all the in-core ones.
>
> +1.

Are there other opinions? That's not a 9.6 blocker IMO, so I could get
patches out for 10.0 if needed.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2016-06-01 00:33:00 Re: Statement timeout
Previous Message Peter van Hardenberg 2016-06-01 00:04:14 Re: JSON[B] arrays are second-class citizens