From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition |
Date: | 2016-07-14 23:38:19 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSVzxr_mhW6+DzFFmUEv8xqYVd09zcSD00UqdVcF-fWug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de> writes:
>> Tom Lane writes:
>>> We've dealt with similar issues in places like pg_relation_size() by
>>> making the functions return NULL instead of throwing an error for an
>>> unmatched argument OID.
>
>> Note that Michael Paquier sent a patch implementing this in another
>> thread:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTxF5dtxjEzB7xkJvOWxX8D_2atxmTu3PSnkhcWT_JY5A@mail.gmail.com
>
> Ah, I had a feeling that this had come up recently, but failed to remember
> that there was already a patch. Maybe we should just bump up the priority
> of reviewing that patch.
Indeed, I didn't immediately recall that by looking at this thread.
That's registered in the next CF, so it is not lost.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-07-15 02:17:42 | Re: Unable to test parallel aggregate/joins in Postgres beta 2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-14 21:42:39 | Re: sslmode=require fallback |