| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* controlling format are confusing (Was: Misleading error message in logical decoding) |
| Date: | 2014-09-18 15:21:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSFttjNB_2kAHa8OdNGJjvzakucGf24tsfkV-kRxqbo5g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2014-09-18 09:50:38 -0500, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > Do you see the difference between what your doc patch states and the
>> > explanation I've given nearby in this thread?
>> Perhaps that's the lack of documentation...
>
> Man. I've explained it to you about three times. The previous attempts
> at doing so didn't seem to help. If my explanations don't explain it so
> you can understand it adding them to the docs won't change a thing.
> That's why I ask whether you see the difference?
Urg sorry for the misunderstanding. The patch stated that this
parameter only influences the output of the SQL functions while it
defines if "the output plugin requires the output method to support
binary data"?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2014-09-18 16:07:34 | BUG: *FF WALs under 9.2 (WAS: .ready files appearing on slaves) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-09-18 14:56:58 | Re: Options OUTPUT_PLUGIN_* controlling format are confusing (Was: Misleading error message in logical decoding) |