Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
Subject: Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Date: 2016-02-29 03:45:13
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS5oTHrrHwFQ3PKK3TFW9AHwzGOtUmpz5XBAWdWxgah4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> If there are no other complaints or comments, I will commit the attached
> sometime this coming week (the the requisite catversion bump).

Thanks for the updated patch, I have nothing else to say on my side.
The new version has fixed the MSVC build, I just double-checked it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-02-29 04:35:47 Re: [REVIEW] In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-02-29 02:56:55 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics