Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2013-10-09 22:43:12
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS+WYN021oQHd9GPe_5dSVcVXMvEBW_E2AV9OOEwggMHw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marking this patch as "returned with feedback", I will not be able to
work on that by the 15th of October. It would have been great to get
the infrastructure patches 0002 and 0003 committed to minimize the
work on the core patch, but well it is not the case.

I am attaching as well a patch fixing some comments of index_drop, as
mentioned by Andres in another thread, such as it doesn't get lost in
the flow.

Thanks to all for the involvement.

Regards,
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
20131002_index_drop_comments.patch application/octet-stream 1.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-10-09 22:57:14 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-10-09 22:31:13 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem