Re: Speedup twophase transactions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date: 2016-01-12 12:53:25
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRvfVJttSSRAiokqxnD-S9ufTCO3nrRQCxYX1OF6xjHOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Should we just move the code somewhere just to imply it is generic? Seems
> pointless refactoring to me.

Er, why not xlogutils.c? Having the 2PC code depending directly on
something that is within logicalfuncs.c is weird.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2016-01-12 12:54:21 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-12 12:49:38 Re: Speedup twophase transactions