Re: Shared memory and processes

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: david(at)andl(dot)org
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shared memory and processes
Date: 2016-04-28 04:46:39
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRtcDp4Q-TcE4NzhHCSERjVxLc4RvR1ns9NXgf7TjKg7w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:24 PM, <david(at)andl(dot)org> wrote:
>> From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com]
>> Another thing that you may want to look at is DSM (dynamic shared memory),
>> with its interface in dsm.h. An example of use is in src/test/modules/test_shm_mq.
>
> Yes, that is useful. I'm curious why the documentation (F.41) was removed between 9.4 and 9.5 -- is there a problem?

No, some of the contrib/ modules have been moved in the code tree and
are now considered as only test modules, which do not get installed by
default. As a result, their documentation has been removed.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-28 05:22:39 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] Re: pgsql: Convert contrib/seg's bool-returning SQL functions to V1 call co
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-04-28 04:45:01 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW