Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date: 2017-02-01 04:49:26
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRrXkAivvuFyGo3vOCMwx8V8y5CbVPQMAFa_Krx8=2fAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I propose that we should finish the job by inventing CatalogTupleDelete(),
>> which for the moment would be a trivial wrapper around
>> simple_heap_delete(), maybe just a macro for it.
>>
>> If there's no objections I'll go make that happen in a day or two.
>
> Sounds good.

As you are on it, I have moved the patch to CF 2017-03.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-01 04:51:03 Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-01 04:48:22 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6