| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more |
| Date: | 2016-09-15 12:32:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQu1GpMzkB4S6XO0_+1cAUx==RDVF70vCmDytuA=nCHiQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> I backpatched this to 9.5, but not further than that. The functions this
> modified were moved around in 9.5, so the patch wouldn't apply as is. It
> wouldn't be difficult to back-patch further if there's demand, but I'm not
> eager to do that until someone complains.
Not going older than 9.5 may be fine:
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2014/12/23/the-new-release-strategy/
https://wiki.freebsd.org/OpenSSL
As far as I can see 1.0.2 would be supported until Dec 2019, so that
would just overlap with 9.4's EOL.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-09-15 12:34:13 | Re: autonomous transactions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-09-15 12:29:51 | Re: sequences and pg_upgrade |