| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: how to find out whether a view is updatable |
| Date: | 2013-06-11 00:03:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQhk2Q5-W_Te4BPyGCapnM1r69p=UvJey2iZyGyA8g8YA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sorry for my late reply.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
> I called it updatable rather than "writable" or "read-only" because it
> might perhaps be extended in the future with separate options for
> "insertable" and "deletable". It could also be extended to give
> column-level control over updatability, or something like
> "use_remote_updatability" could be added, but that all feels like 9.4
> material.
>
Yes this is definitely material for 9.4. You should add this patch to the
1st commit fest. I'll add myself as a reviewer.
Thanks,
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-06-11 00:27:18 | Re: ALTER TABLE ... ALTER CONSTRAINT |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-06-11 00:01:15 | Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks) |