Re: snapshot too old, configured by time

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
Date: 2015-12-03 00:22:39
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQb-SuMVoARViTZ7K6eZnQWy9yGSvTgoF3g0Rpb78PHSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> There has been a review but no replies for more than 1 month. Returned
>> with feedback?
>
> I do intend to post another version of the patch to tweak the
> calculations again, after I can get a patch in to expand the
> testing capabilities to allow an acceptable way to test the patch
> -- so I put it into the next CF instead.

OK, thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-03 00:24:35 Re: psql: add \pset true/false
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-03 00:20:05 Re: pgsql: Refactor Perl test code