Re: Patch to support SEMI and ANTI join removal

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Patch to support SEMI and ANTI join removal
Date: 2015-02-13 07:52:28
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQNt3r5hNEz3_Xw9WtZa3hjkfs60YKTSTL+es9hNuWppQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:23 PM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> As the patch stands there's still a couple of FIXMEs in there, so there's
> still a bit of work to do yet.
> Comments are welcome
>

Hm, if there is still work to do, we may as well mark this patch as
rejected as-is, also because it stands in this state for a couple of months.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-02-13 07:55:28 Re: PATCH: hashjoin - gracefully increasing NTUP_PER_BUCKET instead of batching
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-02-13 07:48:39 Re: Logical Replication Helpers WIP for discussion