Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)

From: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Date: 2012-03-01 21:57:36
Message-ID: CAAZKuFb1YHmZL1yU=AtmrQH5SiTmXTvZzf+wj6xuThMa4wUcXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> My expectation is that this feature will make life a lot
> easier for a lot of Postgres users.

Yes. It's hard to overstate the apparent utility of this feature in
the general category of visibility and profiling.

--
fdr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-03-01 22:09:34 Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-01 21:51:38 Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays