| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Date: | 2015-03-16 07:15:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LvL1uF5OP8DeGRSZ6QKwSM5Ltc5rSTeTO4R0+pPfcvpA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > I think this can happen if funnel->nextqueue is greater
> > than funnel->nqueues.
> > Please see if attached patch fixes the issue, else could you share the
> > scenario in more detail where you hit this issue.
>
> Uh, isn't this copying an overlapping memory region? If so you should
> be using memmove instead.
>
Agreed, will update this in next version of patch.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2015-03-16 07:28:27 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-03-16 07:14:00 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |