| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Васильев Дмитрий <d(dot)vasilyev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794 |
| Date: | 2016-03-19 06:32:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LHN6j3cR3wo0vN7+hzKW12oDOxj1yEcuN8yKkegyXPBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2016-03-18 20:14:07 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > I have done some
> > tests on Windows with 0003 patch which includes running the regressions
> > (vcregress check) and it passes. Will look into it tomorrow once again
and
> > share if I find anything wrong with it, but feel to proceed if you want.
>
> Thanks for the testing thus far! Let's see what the buildfarm has to
> say.
>
Won't the new code needs to ensure that ResetEvent(latchevent) should get
called in case WaitForMultipleObjects() comes out when both
pgwin32_signal_event and latchevent are signalled at the same time?
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2016-03-19 06:34:37 | Re: Weighted Stats |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2016-03-19 06:29:58 | Re: logger process infinite loop |