| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LWLocks in DSM memory |
| Date: | 2016-08-19 11:14:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Khd-rcVvmzfnrepntTfZH2Zh2oE8q6KzDao0pAfqFGqA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
>> >Yes. I want a long wait list, modified in bulk - which should be the
>> >case with the above.
>>
>
> I ran some pgbench. And, I do not see much difference in performance,
> small variance in perf can be attributed to variance in probability of
> drawing the particular built-in script.
>
>
Can you specify the m/c details as Andres wants tests to be conducted on
some high socket m/c?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mithun Cy | 2016-08-19 11:46:26 | Re: LWLocks in DSM memory |
| Previous Message | Mithun Cy | 2016-08-19 10:59:00 | Re: LWLocks in DSM memory |