| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
| Date: | 2016-08-27 05:36:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+RH=nfN+LA2n8k-2ss2pfK-SH88QOtNKKhE5xBoR_=iA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I think you should add this as part of the default testing for both
> check and installcheck. I can't imagine why we'd have it and not use
> it during testing.
>
The actual consistency checks are done during redo (replay), so not
sure whats in you mind for enabling it with check or installcheck. I
think we can run few recovery/replay tests with this framework. Also
running the tests under this framework could be time-consuming as it
logs the entire page for each WAL record we write and then during
replay reads the same.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-08-27 07:43:45 | Re: shm_mq_set_sender() crash |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2016-08-27 01:26:01 | Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more |