From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
Date: | 2016-07-13 12:57:46 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+B4fu5haTGg1ajyuRF9EK2ZhJsgTu7cT1GDArPHqe+0w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
>> I'm a bit confused, why aren't we simply adding LSN interlock
>> checks for toast? Doesn't look that hard? Seems like a much more
>> natural course of fixing this issue?
>
> I took some time trying to see what you have in mind, and I'm
> really not "getting it".
>
Isn't it possible if we initialize lsn and whenTaken in SnapshotToast
when old_snapshot_threshold > 0 and add a check for
HeapTupleSatisfiesToast in TestForOldSnapshot()?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-07-13 13:17:41 | pgsql: Add missing hyphen |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-07-12 22:38:01 | pgsql: Add serial comma and quoting to message |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pgerber | 2016-07-13 13:21:22 | BUG #14247: COMMENT is restored on wrong database |
Previous Message | Netanel Katzburg | 2016-07-13 12:23:17 | Re: Disable WAL completely - Performance and Persistency research |