Re: Parallel Seq Scan

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date: 2015-01-21 10:44:40
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+8h6KEdjZwJO8i7EbVC5w+wFQYZtg66Xj0o1zpTg_Zkw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Amit Langote <
Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> On 20-01-2015 PM 11:29, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Note - I have yet to handle the new node types introduced at some
> > of the places and need to verify prepared queries and some other
> > things, however I think it will be good if I can get some feedback
> > at current stage.
> >
>
> I got an assertion failure:
>
> In src/backend/executor/execTuples.c: ExecStoreTuple()
>
> /* passing shouldFree=true for a tuple on a disk page is not sane */
> Assert(BufferIsValid(buffer) ? (!shouldFree) : true);
>

Good Catch!
The reason is that while master backend is scanning from a heap
page, if it finds another tuple/tuples's from shared memory message
queue it will process those tuples first and in such a scenario, the scan
descriptor will still have reference to buffer which it is using from
scanning
from heap. Your proposed fix will work.

> After fixing this, the assertion failure seems to be gone though I
> observed the blocked (CPU maxed out) state as reported elsewhere by Thom
> Brown.
>

Does it happen only when parallel_seqscan_degree > max_worker_processes?

Thanks for checking the patch.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-01-21 11:01:12 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2015-01-21 10:32:59 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Disable -faggressive-loop-optimizations in gcc 4.8+ for pre-9.2