Re: Patch (3): Implement failover on libpq connect level.

On 26 October 2015 at 07:58, Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru> wrote:
> On 2015.10.14 at 13:41:51 +0300, Victor Wagner wrote:
>
>> Attached patch which implements client library failover and
>> loadbalancing as was described in the proposal
>> <20150818041850(dot)GA5092(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>.
>
> New version of patch
>
> 1. Handles replication connections correctly (i.e doesn't attempt to
> check readwrite mode if replication option is on)
> 2. Some minor improvement recommended by Korry Douglas in
> <562A9259(dot)4060408(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>

This patch doesn't apply. On line 636, this appears:

<<<<<<< BEGIN MERGE CONFLICT: local copy shown first <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
+ if (value[0] == 't')
======= COMMON ANCESTOR content follows ============================
+ if (strcmp(value, "true") == 0)
======= MERGED IN content follows ==================================
+ if (value[0]=='t')
>>>>>>> END MERGE CONFLICT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Thom