Re: Bug: Deferred FKey Check Happening on Double Update, Not Single

From: Doug Safreno <doug(at)avinetworks(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Gregory Cox <gcox(at)avinetworks(dot)com>, Sambit Das <sambit(dot)das(at)avinetworks(dot)com>, Vivek Kalyanaraman <vivek(at)avinetworks(dot)com>, Anand Parthasarathy <anpartha(at)avinetworks(dot)com>, webapp-dev <webapp-dev(at)avinetworks(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Bug: Deferred FKey Check Happening on Double Update, Not Single
Date: 2019-02-16 00:11:04
Message-ID: CAA=+orsauoKK_qit6kpe9TUYhUATkLQWFUPp2VOhEdN23p3+3g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Gotcha, thanks for explanation.

Best,
Doug

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 3:15 PM Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
wrote:

> >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Safreno <doug(at)avinetworks(dot)com> writes:
>
> Doug> Hey Sergei,
>
> Doug> Neither transaction touches FK fields - so shouldn't they both
> Doug> skip FK trigger check?
>
> The optimization that lets the check be skipped only applies on the
> _first_ modification of the row within the transaction. On the second or
> subsequent modifications, the code can't easily tell whether the row was
> inserted in the current transaction (in which case the optimization must
> be skipped) or just modified, so it assumes the worst.
>
> --
> Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-16 00:13:08 Re: BUG #15631: Generated as identity field in a temporary table with on commit drop corrupts system catalogs
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2019-02-15 23:15:25 Re: Bug: Deferred FKey Check Happening on Double Update, Not Single