| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Simulating Clog Contention |
| Date: | 2012-01-19 18:02:24 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLGJV67u+bRYJqWEJOr7QsU5POVA-VW7bgXMe4H2=agvw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I feel I've adequate explained why it makes sense to me to separate
> those options. If you want, I'll do the work myself; it will take
> less time than arguing about it.
If you have time to contribute, please use the patch as stands to test
the other patches in the CF queue.
It's more important that we measure and fix clog contention than have
a new pgbench feature with no immediate value to the next release of
Postgres.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-19 18:10:39 | Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps |
| Previous Message | Alex Shulgin | 2012-01-19 17:59:35 | Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic) |