Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Simulating Clog Contention

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simulating Clog Contention
Date: 2012-01-19 18:02:24
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLGJV67u+bRYJqWEJOr7QsU5POVA-VW7bgXMe4H2=agvw@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I feel I've adequate explained why it makes sense to me to separate
> those options.  If you want, I'll do the work myself; it will take
> less time than arguing about it.

If you have time to contribute, please use the patch as stands to test
the other patches in the CF queue.

It's more important that we measure and fix clog contention than have
a new pgbench feature with no immediate value to the next release of
Postgres.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-01-19 18:10:39
Subject: Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps
Previous:From: Alex ShulginDate: 2012-01-19 17:59:35
Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group