Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: Simulating Clog Contention
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: > I feel I've adequate explained why it makes sense to me to separate > those options. If you want, I'll do the work myself; it will take > less time than arguing about it. If you have time to contribute, please use the patch as stands to test the other patches in the CF queue. It's more important that we measure and fix clog contention than have a new pgbench feature with no immediate value to the next release of Postgres. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
- Re: Simulating Clog Contention at 2012-01-19 17:47:10 from Robert Haas
Responses
- Re: Simulating Clog Contention at 2012-01-19 18:25:00 from Robert Haas
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: Robert Haas Date: 2012-01-19 18:10:39 Subject: Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps Previous: From: Alex Shulgin Date: 2012-01-19 17:59:35 Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)