Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
On 8 June 2012 18:26, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: > I would be more open to warning people about CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE > - frankly, it's pretty wonky that we allow that but treat GLOBAL as a > noise word in this first place. But I'm a little disinclined to have > the message speculate about what might happen in future versions of > PostgreSQL. Such predictions don't have a very good track record of > being accurate. Agreed. We should make use of GLOBAL throw an ERROR: feature not yet implemented, in preparation for what might one day happen. We don't know the future but we do know the present. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
In response to
- Re: Temporary tables under hot standby at 2012-06-08 17:26:20 from Robert Haas
Responses
- Re: Temporary tables under hot standby at 2012-06-08 18:05:24 from Kevin Grittner
pgsql-hackers by date
Next: From: David Fetter Date: 2012-06-08 17:41:33 Subject: Re: New Postgres committer: Kevin Grittner Previous: From: Robert Haas Date: 2012-06-08 17:26:20 Subject: Re: Temporary tables under hot standby